Modern Irrigation & Land Co. v. Neely
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Jackson, J., entered September 2, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, stating an account, in an action for an accounting.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
This is an action by the owner of lands, against real estate brokers, its agents, for an accounting. A statement of the facts essential to an understanding of the issues, admitted by both parties as substantially correct, is as follows:
On March 5, 1905, the defendant Neely was, by contract with the plaintiff, made exclusive sales agent for certain of its lands. The contract contemplated sales on the deferred payment plan, deferred payments to bear seven per cent in*40terest. It provided that the agent should receive on sales a commission,. . equal to sixteen (16% ) per cent of the total purchase…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gilder v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Excelsior Terra Cotta Co. v. . HardeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Gray v. . Central R.R. Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Sweeny v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Rood v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Kahl v. AblanWashington Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.