Legal Opinion
State v. Russell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 16, 2009No. 2008-458PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Lee Russell, was convicted of armed robbery and reckless conduct, see RSA 636:3, III (2007); RSA 631:3 (2007), following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Brown, J.). On appeal, he argues that: (1) the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of his threatening statements pursuant to New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b); and (2) the trial court committed plain error when it sentenced him to an extended term of imprisonment. We affirm.
The jury could have found the following facts. On November 14,2006, the defendant; his cousin, Jenika Senter; Vincent Cooper; Cooper’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. NightingaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.