Legal Opinion
Evelyn Hinkle v. Marcus L. Hampton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1968No. 9496PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff appellant seeks reversal of a verdict and judgment in her favor which was in the amount of $500.00. How much more she had sought does not appear in the record which is before us, but undoubtedly her demand exceeded substantially the amount awarded. Although she does not specifically complain that the amount is legally inadequate, it is nevertheless plain that this is the main source of her dissatisfaction.
The appeal is limited in scope, and therefore it is unnecessary to relate the facts in detail. It will be sufficient to mention that the action…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Frederick Z. Goosman, to His Own Use and to the Use of Royal Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Donald v. Sellers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. John DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Blas Chavez, Jr. v. United States of America, Nonie Tenorio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roland Sandidge v. Salen Offshore Drilling Company, Salen Protexa Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. Federal Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Manes v. DowlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Smith v. Vicorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Peter Parento v. Victor A. PalumboCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.