Legal Opinion
Smith v. Vicorp, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1997No. 96-4049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The sole issue we are required to decide in this appeal is whether the federal district court in Utah was required to ask questions on voir dire which are required by state law in all tort cases. Because we hold that the content of questions on voir dire is a matter of federal law and that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- James Kiernan and Mary Kiernan v. Gerald Van Schaik, T/a Van's Atlantic StationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Floyd Darbin v. George NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Barrett v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chlopek v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Chlopek, Denise C. v. Fed'l Insur CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Cloward v. RaceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- Cody Dee Skinner v. Berry Petroleum Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025