Legal Opinion
BUSINESS & PRODUCT PROMOTION, INC. v. East Tincup, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 2, 1964No. 20885PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
Defendant in error, to whom we will refer as plaintiff, filed its motion to strike the reporter’s transcript, from the record and to dismiss the writ of error in this-cause.
The ground asserted in support of the motion to strike is that the reporter’s transcript was not lodged with the clerk of the trial court within 60 days from the date-of judgment as required by Rule 112 (f), R.C.P. Colo., but was lodged more than 150 days after the date of judgment. It is disclosed by the record that no extension of time was granted by the trial court within which the reporter’s transcript could be filed.
Th…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanchez v. Securities Acceptance Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Meagher v. NealSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Freeman v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Smith v. WoodallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oman v. MorrisColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- Marcotte v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Henry v. LattaColorado Court of Appeals · 1970