Golden State Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
McCOMB, J., Concurring.
I concur in the conclusion of the majority of the court. However, it is with considerable reluctance that I am unable to agree with the reasoning of my learned associates. Section 2021, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure provides in part that the testimony of a witness may be taken by deposition “when the witness is ... an officer, member, agent, or employee of a corporation ...”
As I read the majority opinion, it leads to one of two inevitable results: Either the court is (a) holding that “is” means “was” or (b) inserting in the statute the word “was”, so as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- International Coal Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- People v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Scott v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Evarts v. Killingworth Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.