Legal Opinion

Estate of Barnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6555PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Two appeals are taken jointly from orders of the superior court sitting in probate in the manner of the settlement of the annual account of the trustee under the will of Melaneton Barnett.

The appellants are beneficiaries under the trust who objected to the settlement of the account upon the ground that a new trustee was substituted for the one named by the testator without their approval or consent. The respondent is a national banking association which, by numerous conveyances, has succeeded to all the business of the original trustee. These sales were all made with the approval of the state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Proving the Will of BergdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Provident Institution for Savings v. MaloneSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kennecott Copper Corporation v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  2. United States v. Merchants Nat. Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Richardson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Estate of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API