Auchampaugh v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Buchanan District Court. — Hon. D. J. Lenehan, Judge. Action on a promissory note. The district court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and from a judgment thereon the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
— It is to be regretted that this cause must be for the fourth time reversed in this court. At the trial, in which judgment was entered, from which the last former appeal was taken, there was judgment for. defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. At that trial in the district court the plaintiff moved the court, at the close of the evidence, to direct a verdict for him, and it was held in this court that it was error to refuse the motion. At the last trial in the district court, at the close of the evidence, the plaintiff presented a similar motion, which the court sustained ; and, as we think…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Wilkins v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Reints v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. New York Hamilton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930