Wilkins v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $300 upon •a promissory note. Defense of defendants Bayer and Beck is stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Nye, J., who directed a verdict against defendants Hanson and denied a motion to direct a verdict against defendants Bayer and Beck, and a jury who returned .a verdict in their favor. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action was to recover on a promissory note executed by the •defendants Betty Hanson and A. Hanson, as principals, and by defendants Bayer and Beck as sureties. The Hansons did not appear at the trial, and a verdict was directed in plaintiff’s favor as agairist them. As between plaintiff and defendants Bayer and Beck, the case was submitted to the jury, and a verdict returned in favor of said defendants. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The assignments of error raise but one question: Was plaintiff ■entitled on the evidence to a directed verdict against…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sioux Valley State Bank v. KellogSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Auchampaugh v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- McClure Newspapers, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- United States ex rel. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1937
- Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. New York Hamilton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930