Legal Opinion

Larkin v. Williams, Woolley, Cogswell, Nakazawa & Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1999No. B126368PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. Introduction

Defendants, the law partnership of Williams, Woolley, Cogswell, Nakazawa & Russell, and individual partners, Reed M. Williams, David E. R. Woolley, Forrest R. Cogswell, Alan Nakazawa, and Thomas A. Russell, appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration of a dispute with plaintiff, Blake W. Larkin. The trial court relied on the decision in Smith v. Superior Court (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 128, 131-134 [20 Cal.Rptr. 512]. We conclude Smith should be limited to its facts and that opinion has no application to the present case, which involves an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Bono v. DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API