Larkin v. Williams, Woolley, Cogswell, Nakazawa & Russell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.—
I. Introduction
Defendants, the law partnership of Williams, Woolley, Cogswell, Nakazawa & Russell, and individual partners, Reed M. Williams, David E. R. Woolley, Forrest R. Cogswell, Alan Nakazawa, and Thomas A. Russell, appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration of a dispute with plaintiff, Blake W. Larkin. The trial court relied on the decision in Smith v. Superior Court (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 128, 131-134 [20 Cal.Rptr. 512]. We conclude Smith should be limited to its facts and that opinion has no application to the present case, which involves an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bono v. DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.