Legal Opinion

Williams v. Spitzer Auto World Canton, 2007 Ca 00187 (5-27-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2008No. 2007 CA 00187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant Spitzer Auto World Canton LLC appeals the decision of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, which granted a monetary judgment and attorney fees in favor of Appellee Reynold Williams, Jr. in a consumer sales practices lawsuit. The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows.

{¶ 2} Appellant is a Pontiac-GMC automobile dealership in located in Canton, Ohio. In early October 2004, Appellee Williams made a couple of visits to appellant's showroom, expressing an interest in purchasing a new sport-utility vehicle. He first looked at a 2004 GMC Yukon Denali, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sanek v. Duracote Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Whitaker v. M.T. Automotive, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API