State v. Monteleone
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The defendant, Joe Monteleone, was convicted of carrying on the business of wholesale fish dealer without first having procured a license as such from the department of conservation, in violation of section 30 of Act 264 of 1928. This appeal is from the conviction and sentence imposed thereunder.
Appellant’s defense against the charge on which he is prosecuted is that the statute on which it is based is unconstitutional, in that it contains two objects and is broader than its title, contrary to section 16 of article 3 of the Constitution of 1921.
Appellant contends that the two objects set…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lacoste v. Department of ConservationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- White Oil Corp. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- LaBauve v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- LaBauve v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- City of Shreveport v. BristerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. MaslingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.