Legal Opinion

En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 28, 1931No. 19939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action or controversy involves the devolution of a Seminole allotment where the allottee died after the 31st day of December, 1899, and prior to receiving his allotment, the devolution of which became subject to the provisions of section 2 of the Supplemental Seminole Agreement (31 St. L. 250).

Plaintiffs bring their action in ejectment and for an accounting, alleging that they are all members of the Seminole Tribe or Nation of Indians, and are full-bloods, except Lousanna Harjo, who is alleged to be enrolled as a half-blood citizen or member of said tribe, and allege in substance that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelly's Heirs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  2. Shulthis v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Lincoln v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Chastain v. LarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Reed v. NarcomeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fish v. LackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Harjo v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Johnson v. ChristianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Johnson v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Johnson v. WilmottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API