Legal Opinion

Reed v. Narcomey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1928No. 18626PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, C. J.

The plaintiffs (defendants in error here), in the district court of Seminole county, obtained a judgment in ejectment that they owned and were entitled to the immediate possession of an undivided one-half of a certain tract of land. The land was an Indian allotment, made under the original and the Supplemental Seminole Agreement (31 Stat. L. 250). The allottee was one Lowine Marshall. She was enrolled as a full-blood Seminole citizen on the final rolls of said tribe, prepared by the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes under the acts of the national Congress. Both the father and the mother…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shulthis v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Pigeon v. BuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Thorn v. ConeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. McDougal v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. En-Le-Te-Ke v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Gibson v. VillinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Yamie v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API