Johnson v. Douglas

In this case substantially the same state of facts are pleaded as in En-le-te-ke. et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CTJLLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.