Legal Opinion

Blom v. Kumbier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

Appellant asserts prejudicial error in instructing the jury and in refusing to submit a requested question. We consider however that the judgment should be affirmed.

1. Instruction on right of way. The jury was instructed, in substance, that if Blom made a full stop in response to the arterial stop sign, then he had the right of way, and the question whether defendant was negligent in respect to yielding the right of way should be answered. Appellants contend it was error to give this instruction without the qualification that the stop must have been made where the driver could make an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kraskey v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Madison Trust Co. v. HellecksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kleckner v. Great American Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Eberdt v. MullerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martell v. KlingmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Reno v. Silver State Flying Service, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wanserski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Magin v. BemisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Nothem v. BerenschotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API