Legal Opinion

Madison Trust Co. v. Helleckson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowlee, J.

The appellants contend that the court erred: (1) In overruling their demurrer ore tenus to the complaint, and (2) in denying their motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint; that the evidence was insufficient to support the findings of the jury, (3) as to fraud in procurement of the release, and (4) upon the issue of negligence, (5) that the damages assessed by the jury are excessive; that the court erred (6) in instructing the jury; and that this court should direct dismissal of the complaint or order a new trial.(1) (2) The appellants devote five pages of their brief to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allison v. Wm. Doerflinger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Birdsey v. ButterfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Swoboda v. RubinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Karls v. DrakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. EvistonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Toppass v. Perkins' AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Safety Casualty Co. v. McGeeTexas Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API