Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Wilbanks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 7 Div. 964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill by judgment creditor for discovery, attaches interrogatories and prays that the moneys and properties of W. P. Cooke, in the hands of defendant L. Cooke, be held subject to the payment of complainant’s judgment ; that if there are not sufficient moneys so impressed and available, that the purchase money notes of the Leeds Cooperage Company be condemned and ordered sold, and the proceeds applied to balance due on complainant’s judgment.

It is further prayed in the bill that it be decreed that defendant L. Cooke, received from defendant W. P. Cooke, moneys and properties of an amount…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Mahone v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mid-City Bank & Trust Co. v. Reading Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
  2. Morrison v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Caldwell v. CaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Grayson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Newell v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API