Legal Opinion

Newell v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1935No. 1 Div. 863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill seeks reformation and foreclosure ■of a mortgage by Newell and wife to L. L. Armstrong.

The respondents and the complainant admit in their testimony the mutual mistake in •the description of the property in some respects, as corrected in the decree (Parra v. -Cooper et al., 213 Ala. 340, 104 So. 827; McKleroy v. Dishman, 225 Ala. 131, 142 So. 41; Webb et al. v. Sprott, 225 Ala. 600, 144 So. 569), and the decree of reformation is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

There is no conflict in the evidence ■that the husband and wife were personally ■before the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. McCrory v. DonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Webb v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Brittain v. Commercial Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Swanson v. BergeronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API