Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 2, 1926No. 3558PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

This is a suit at law on a contract for insurance issued under the War Risk Insurance Act. This court has jurisdiction of such a suit. Act June 7, 1924, Stat. 1923-1925, pp. 607-630 (Comp. St. Supp. 1925, § 9127½ — 1 et seq.); United States v. Napoleon et al., 296 F. 811 (C. C. A. 5th Circuit). Suits at law are to be tried to a jury unless waived in writing by the parties. Sections 566, 649, R. S. U. S. (Comp. St. §§ 1583, 1587); Law v. United States, 45 S. Ct. 175, 266 U. S. 494, 69 L. Ed. 401; United States v. Pfitsch, 41 S. Ct. 569, 256 U. S. 547, 65 L. Ed. 1084.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Margolin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Crouch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Whitney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hacker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  2. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API