Hacker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
These two cases were argued at the same time, present identically the same question, and may be disposed of in one opinion.
Plaintiffs in error brought suits to recover on policies of war risk insurance. Adhering to his opinion previously expressed in Allen v. U. S., 10 F.(2d) 807, the District Court sustained motions of the government to try the cases without the intervention of the jury, and rendered judgment in favor of the United States on the law and the facts as found by him. Error is assigned to the action of the court in denying plaintiffs in error a trial by jury.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Whitney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pence v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ohlinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1955
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. SalmonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.