Legal Opinion

State v. Eckelberry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1922No. 22,939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of abduction of an unmarried girl under the age of 18 years for the purpose of sexual intercourse. He appeals.

The statute under which defendant was indicted and convicted reads as follows:

“Every person who shall take a female under the age of eighteen years, for the purpose of prostitution or sexual intercourse, s * * shall be guilty of abduction * * G. S. 1918, § 8659, subd. 1.

The state’s evidence is that on the afternoon of June 8 a stranger, identified as defendant, called in an automobile at the home of the complaining witness Lenora, on a farm two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jordt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1869
  2. State v. LauzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CoramWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. MahramusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. KlashtorniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. State v. EkbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. State v. DuffySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API