Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Duffy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929No. File No. 6409Published

1DissentSherwood, P. J.

I dissent from two conclusions contained in the majority opinion. First, that the word, “debauch,” as used in section 1 of chapter 1, Session Laws 1921, “is practically synonymous with the phrase, ‘carnal knowledge.’ ” The statute under consideration, so far as applicable here, provides in substance that every person who takes any female under 18 years of age away from her father, mother, or other person having legal charge o-f her person “for the purpose of debauchery, illicit relationship, concubinage, prostitution, or other immoral purpose, is punishable by imprisonment in the state…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Athanasaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Weisiger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. State v. EckelberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. People v. Wah Lee MonNew York Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API