Legal Opinion
Fontana v. Zymol Enterprises, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 23, 2006No. AC 25946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The defendant, Zymol Enterprises, Inc., appeals from the judgment rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Richard Fontana. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motion for a remittitur and (2) instructed the jury on the exception to the statute of frauds. We affirm the judgment of the trial court with respect to the first claim and dismiss the appeal as to the defendant’s second claim.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In 1985, the plaintiff and his son-in-law, Charles E. Bennett, founded Zymol Enterprises, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Tomczuk v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PHH Mortgage Corp. v. CameronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Johnson v. PikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Lingenheld v. Desjardins Woodworking, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008