Legal Opinion
PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Cameron
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 19, 2011No. AC 32560PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The pro se defendant Norman Cameron 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting his motion to dismiss a foreclosure action filed by the plaintiff, PHH Mortgage Corporation, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly addressed the merits of his claim that the promissory note was unenforceable. 2 We dismiss the appeal.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the appeal. On July 22, 2005, Melissa Cameron executed a promissory note in favor of Members Mortgage Company, Inc. (Members).…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. TDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Lawson v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Eureka V, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of RidgefieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Connecticut Independent Utility Workers, Local 12924 v. Dept. of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Drummer v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.