Legal Opinion

State v. Hoppe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1974No. 44733, 44737 and 44738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice. *

These cases involve interpretation of a 1972 amendment to Minn. Const, art. 4, § 1, respecting the time during which the legislature may meet. While there are some issues peculiar to each case, there are overriding issues affecting all so the cases have been considered together in so far as the issues in one case may have a bearing on the determination of issues common to all.

The legislature is now in an adjourned session (i. e., a session provided for upon adjournment in May 1973 to a day certain in January 1974), and in order to obtain an expeditious decision of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Corbett v. Town of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scarnati, J.,et al, Aplts. v. Wolf, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Seventy-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  5. BIXLER BY BIXLER v. JC Penney Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API