Legal Opinion

In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 28, 1990No. Master File No. 87-CV-60103-AAPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*456ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LA PLATA, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation submitted in this case and any objections filed thereto. The Magistrate's Report and Recommendation is hereby accepted as the findings and conclusion of the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion to terminate this lawsuit is GRANTED, and the derivative claim is dismissed with prejudice.

MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

Filed July 20, 1990.

STEVEN D. PEPE, United States Magistrate.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Background Facts…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stepak v. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re DalenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Glancy v. Taubman Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
  5. Stepak v. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API