Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Windom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 7, 2000No. 1991370PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This mandamus petition raises the question whether a party who has moved to transfer a case to another venue is entitled, while the transfer motion is pending, to have all matters of discovery in the pending case limited to issues relating to the motion to transfer.

Stephen R. Windom is a defendant in a civil action filed by Garfield W. Ivey, Jr. That action is pending in the Walker Circuit Court. This is the second time Windom has sought mandamus relief from this Court relating to the scope of discovery pending the trial judge’s ruling on his motion to transfer. Windom’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Compass BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Mobile Fixture & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte WindomSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Snow v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ivey v. WindomSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Newman v. Kenworth of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp. v. JRD Contracting, Inc. (In re Int'l Paper Co.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  4. Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp. v. JRD Contracting, Inc. (In re Int'l Paper Co.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API