Legal Opinion

Newman v. Kenworth of Birmingham, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 29, 2000No. 1991335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Kenworth of Birmingham, Inc. (“Ken-worth”), and Bryan Harland are defendants in an action pending in the Fayette Circuit Court. They petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge James Moore to vacate two orders allowing general unlimited discovery. We grant the petition.

I

In July 1999, Newman Trucking, Inc., acting through Robert Michael Newman, purchased a Kenworth model T2000 truck from Kenworth; the sale was handled by Kenworth salesman Bryan Harland. Mr. Newman and Newman Trucking later sued Kenworth and Harland, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, suppression, breach of contract,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Allied-Bruce v. DobsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Ex Parte Jim Burke Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slamen v. SlamenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  2. Ex Parte Walker Regional Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Cook v. Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC (Ex parte Locklear Chrysler Jeep Dodge, LLC)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Howell v. Alfa Ins. Corp. (In re Alfa Ins. Corp.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Howell v. Alfa Ins. Corp. (In re Alfa Ins. Corp.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API