Legal Opinion

State v. Urban

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1989No. 10719PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for shoplifting, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on sixth amendment speedy trial and fourteenth amendment due process grounds. He asks this court to remand for an evidentiary hearing. Alternatively, he contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The state contends on appeal that defendant’s motion was untimely and incomplete under SCRA 1986, 5-601(D) and (E) and that the record is not sufficient to permit this court to resolve the claim of ineffective assistance.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Toby Joe Gutierrez v. Dan Moriarty, Warden, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. KATRINA G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API