Legal Opinion

State v. Candelaria

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2019No. NOS. A-1-CA-35193; A-1-CA-35225PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIEHNE, Judge Pro Tempore.

*1208 {1} Defendants Nora Chee and Karl Candelaria each appeal from separate judgments and sentences following a jury verdict finding them both guilty of fraud, forgery, and conspiracy to commit fraud, and Defendant Chee guilty of embezzlement, arising from a scheme in which they stole over $200,000 from the franchisor of Defendant Chee's business by writing unauthorized checks to themselves. Because the two cases arise from the same facts, and Defendants raise similar claims, we consolidate these cases for decision. See Rule 12-317(B) NMRA.

{2} Defendants make the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Jesenya O.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. CobleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. DiricksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Martinez v. N.M. Tax'n & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. N.M. Auto. Dealers Assoc. v. N.M. Env't Improvement Bd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API