Legal Opinion

(PC) Cox v. Kernan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01637Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST LEE COX, No. 2:19-cv-01637 JAM DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with a civil rights 18 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended 19 complaint, as screened by the court. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff claims his due process rights were 20 violated as defendant was not an impartial hearing officer during a 2014 rules violation…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API