Fellows v. National Can Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
At Law. Action by Olin S. Fellows against the National Can Company. On motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This action is now before the court upon a motion by the defendant to dismiss the action on various grounds hereinafter discussed. The jurisdiction of this court is properly invoked on the ground of diversity of citizenship, the matter in controversy exceeding the requisite jurisdictional amount.
The material facts, substantially as set forth in the undisputed statement of facts filed in the cause, are as follows:
An action in assumpsit was instituted in this court by Olin S. Fellows (plaintiff herein) against the National Can Company (defendant herein) on the 18th day of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
- Hannan v. SlushDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925