Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Slush

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 20, 1925No. 438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is a bill to-construe a will and to construe and set aside a certain so-called instrument of appointment purporting to have been executed pursuant to said will. The jurisdiction of the court is-properly invoked on the ground of diversity of citizenship.

The plaintiff is Luella Hannan, who is the-widow of William W. Hannan, deceased, a-legatee under the will of said deceased, and a donee of certain trust powers created by said will. The will, which was duly executed December 18, 1916, gave lump sum legacies-to various persons, aggregating approximately $1,000,000,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Mayor of Vicksburg v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Privett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PC) Ernst v. RamosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. AGUILAR GARCIA v. BondiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API