Fischer v. Pope
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
This controversy in one or more of its phases has been before this court twice heretofore. Ex parte Fischer, 229 Ala. 455, 157 So. 869, 870; Fischer v. Pope, 229 Ala. 170, 155 So. 579, 581.
The present bill was filed by appellant after this court denied the mandamus prayed for here in the case of Fischer v. Pope, supra.
•In appellees’ brief before us on the present appeal, following a brief statement of the facts of the case, we find and excerpt the following statement as to the real issue to be here determined on this appeal:
“There is but one question in this case and that is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Farris v. HoustonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Weaver v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Washington v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- O'Neill v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Wood v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Dudley v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Woodlawn Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Cadick Milling Co. v. Dothan Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Ex parte StemberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955