Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Whatley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1943No. 5 Div. 375PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appeal is from an interlocutory decretal order granting the defendant’s motion to dissolve the temporary injunction theretofore issued, and sustaining the demurrer to the bill.

The motion to dissolve is for want of equity in the bill, and upon the sworn answer denying, in part, the allegations of the bill and alleging affirmative defensive matters and proof by affidavit, the complainant submitting counter proof.

In determining whether or not the bill has equity the facts stated and not the manner of their statement are to be considered. Amendable defects apparent or suggested…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Liddell v. ChidesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Singo v. BrainardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Young & Son v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sherrill v. FRANK MORRIS, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Hyde v. StarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Davis v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Dudley v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API