Ex parte Stember
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
The plaintiffs below, Geurald B: Roper and Ethel E. Roper, sued defendant John Stember, alleging that defendant’s agents, servants or employees made certain false representations which induced them to sign a contract for repairs to be made on their home. Some of these representations were that the work would be done without cost to plaintiffs; that the house would be photographed before and after the work and used as a model on television and other media in an advertising program to stimulate defendant’s sales; that a sign would be placed in front of the house and for each…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Turner v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Southern Steel Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Kennedy v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fibreboard Corp. v. FentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ex Parte Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Ex Parte National Union Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Fibreboard Corp. v. FentonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993