Legal Opinion

Addie v. Kjaer

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided August 14, 2009No. Civil No. 2004-135PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(August 14, 2009)

During the course of the trial of the above-captioned matter, the parties requested that the jury be instructed that fraud must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. The Court denied that request. This opinion explains that ruling.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2004, Robert Addie, Jorge Perez and Jason Taylor (together, the “Buyers”) agreed to purchase two parcels of land from defendants Christian Kjaer; Helle Bundegaard; Steen Bundegaard; John Knud Fürst; Kim Fürst; and Nina Fürst (together, the “Sellers”): Great St. James…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Lafferty v. St. RielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. John J. Demarines and Doris A. Demarines, Husband and Wife v. Klm Royal Dutch AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. In the Matter of Martin M. Decker and Kathleen H. Decker, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. Appeal of Martin M. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fitz v. Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API