Legal Opinion
Ranville v. JTS Enterprises, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1984No. 7661PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Matthew Ranville (plaintiff) challenges the district court’s award of worker’s compensation benefits of 15% disability to the body as a whole. He bases his appeal on two issues: (1) Whether he should have been compensated for the loss of a scheduled member under NMSA 1978, Section 52-l-43(A); and (2) whether he should be compensated for the loss of his eye without regard to correction. We hold that plaintiff has suffered an injury to a specific body part which is covered by the scheduled injury section, and that he should receive compensation according to the schedule.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sanchez v. Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- American Tank & Steel Corp. v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Hise Construction v. CandelariaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kerr v. Gibson's Products Co. of Bozeman, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
- Creative Dimensions Group, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Gomez v. Bernalillo County Clerk's OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fierro v. Stanley's HardwareNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.