Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1976No. 2161PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Judgments were entered in the trial court, from which appeals were taken, as follows:(1) On a counterclaim against the Citizens Bank, C. R. Davis and Alice Davis were awarded $79,998.04 compensatory damages and $20,000.00 punitive damages, and on the cross claim of James C. Davis, he was awarded $200,000.00 compensatory damages and $50,000.00 punitive damages. These judgments are based upon fraudulent conduct of Citizens Bank committed against C & H Construction & Paving Co., Inc. (C & H) in which the Davises were officers and managers, and as a direct result of which, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rusch Factors, Inc. v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Kuelling v. Roderick Lean Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Crystal Pier Amusement Co. v. CannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cooper v. WeissblattAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Finley v. KeslingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Garcia v. CoffmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API