Fierro v. Stanley's Hardware
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
In this worker’s compensation action plaintiff sued not only his employer, Stanley’s Hardware, and its insurance carrier, Sentry Claims Service (referred to as “Stanley's” or “employer”), but also the New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund and the administrator of the fund, the Superintendent of Insurance (referred to interchangeably as the “Fund” or the “Superintendent”). From a judgment in favor of plaintiff against Stanley’s, its carrier and the Fund, the Fund and plaintiff appeal.
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act) shall be to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Scott v. RizzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Madrid v. University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- O'Loughlin v. Circle a ConstructionIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Dingus v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Coslett v. Third Street GroceryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.