Legal Opinion
Freeman Manufacturing Co. v. National Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 6, 1894PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
These cases come before us on motions of the defendant bank, made under St. 1883, c. 223, § 6, to annul orders of a single justice of this court suspending, after appeal, decrees of the Superior Court. Those decrees dissolved preliminary injunctions which had been issued in the suits, and the injunctions now have been reinstated. They prohibit the bank from disposing of certain notes pledged to it, but, it is alleged, without right and with notice. The only question before us is whether a State court has power to issue such injunctions before filial judgment.
In U. S. Rev. Sts. § .5242, after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Safford v. First National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
- First National Bank of Kasson v. La DueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Raynor v. . Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by20 opinions
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Meyer v. First National Bank of Coeur d'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Levitan v. Houghton National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Phelan v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Dennis v. First National Bank of SeattleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.