Dennis v. First National Bank of Seattle
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal from order dissolving attachment. The complaint shows the defendant to be a corporation organized under the laws of the United States as a national bank. After the filing of the complaint and an affidavit on behalf of the plaintiff, a writ of attachment was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff. Defendant made a motion, upon proper notice, for an order dissolving the attachment, upon the ground, among others, that the superior court was without jurisdiction to issue said writ and that the same was improperly issued.
By the amendment of March 3, 1873 (U. S. Rev. Stats.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific National Bank v. MixterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Freeman Manufacturing Co. v. National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Baum v. RaphaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Safford v. First National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
- Chesapeake Bank v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer v. First National Bank of Coeur d'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- First Nat. Bank of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Crocker National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kemple v. Sec. First Nat'l Bank of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.