Legal Opinion

ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 14, 1948No. Civ. 8130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The complaint in this action alleges that on February 8, 1945, one Peter Vambell, employed by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was injured near the loading platform of the General Post Office building at 33rd Street and Eighth Avenue, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, as the result of the negligence of post office employees. It is averred that the plaintiff had, prior to that date, issued a workmen’s compensation policy to Vambell’s employer, and that pursuant to the policy Vambell received and accepted certain sums of money due him, but did not within one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Hill v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1947
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. Ex Rel. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  4. Phœnix Ins. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Grace Ex Rel. Grangers Mut. Ins. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1948
  5. Strate v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API