Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 17, 1947No. Civil Action 811PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLEY, District Judge.
This suit comes under the Federal Tort Claims Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 843, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 931. The plaintiffs allege that an army truck driven by a soldier negligently collided with an auto mobile driven by one of the plaintiffs on a public highway. Three of the plaintiffs were in the automobile and each claims personal injuries sustained in the collision. The automobile is said to have been badly damaged. The Insurance . Company plaintiff alleges a .subrogation claim. The suit is to recover damages for personal injuries, also property loss, and to enforce the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- United States v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Augusta Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Old Colony Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.