Legal Opinion

Ind. School Dist. v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Poweshiek District Gourt. This is an action on the official bond of Angus McDonald, as treasurer of plaintiff, against him and his sureties thereon, for balance of moneys in his hands, which he neglects to pay over. There was a trial by the court, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Ch. J.

The District Court, on the trial, made the following findings of facts and conclusions of law:

1. “The defendant, Angus McDonald, was treasurer of plaintiff from March 20th, 1871, to March 20th, 1872, and again, on re-appointment, from April 1st, 1872, to January 4th, 1873, and gave the bond in suit, signed by defendants, Meyers, Tilton, and Bosley, as his sureties on'his qualification for his last term.

2. During both of said terms, as he received money of the district, he did not keep it separate, but put it with his own private funds, and used it in' éonnection with his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. County of Mahaska v. IngallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  5. Bessinger v. DickersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Coover v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. District Township of Fox v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Held v. BagwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API