Legal Opinion
Campbell v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 29, 2008No. Civil Action 07-2013 (ESH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Petitioner Richard James Campbell, proceeding pro se, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He claims that respondents have unlawfully extended his sentence beyond its expiration date in violation of the Eighth Amendment and the Ex Post Facto, Due Process, and Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Constitution. Upon consideration of the parties’ pleadings and the entire record, the Court finds no ground for issuing the writ and therefore will deny the petition.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 15, 1985, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dews v. WALDERNDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Brown v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Herndon v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Coachman v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Garcia v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.