Legal Opinion

Coachman v. U.S. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 5, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

Petitioner Jefferey Coachman contends that he is entitled to certain credit toward service of his sentence which advances the date of his release from custody. For the reasons discussed below, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On February 25, 1993, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, petitioner was sentenced to a term of five to 15 years’ imprisonment. Pet. at 5. A mandatory minimum term of five years applied. See U.S. Parole Comm’n’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Peter C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Hill v. JohnstonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Campbell v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Battle v. CiolliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. Davis v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. Lindsey v. SaadDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API