Legal Opinion

State v. Griep

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 19, 2014No. 2009AP3073-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1 This operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated case raises a recurring and unsettled question of law: under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), may the State submit evidence of a driver's blood alcohol level at trial when the analyst who did the actual testing is unavailable to testify? Given how frequently the issue arises in our state courts, the muddled state of the relevant law, and the arguable conflict between binding state court opinions and subsequent United States Supreme Court opinions, we certified the issue to our state supreme court. State v. Griep, No.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Michael R. GriepWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Michael R. GriepWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API