Legal Opinion
Locke v. Jenkins
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1969No. 69-725PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
In this action, petitioner seeks his release by the writ of habeas corpus and an order requiring the Municipal Court judge to set bail in a reasonable amount.
Section 9, Article I of the Ohio Constitution reads as follows:
“All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses where the proof is evident, or the presumption great. Excessive bail shall not be re*46quired; nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
The right to hail under that section is absolute, the only, exception being for capital offenses. There is no discretion in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BevacquaOhio Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Jones v. HendonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Baker v. TroutmanOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus of HumphreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.